Saturday, August 02, 2003
Ego-tourism
From
The Independent:
But Amnesty stresses that it is not only the Maldives where
our consciences should be disturbed: the records of several
other favourite holiday destinations for Britons, such as
Turkey, Jamaica and Thailand, are full of claims
of state- sponsored brutality, the use of the death penalty
and corrupt law enforcement. [emphasis added]
Funny, I never saw your conscience being disturbed in the
slightest by those "human shields" having their
holiday in Iraq [scroll down a bit for #124]. No, you
glorified those charades, just as you did every effort to
prop up that sadistic, genocidal, torturous, raping,
mutilating regime. Iraq wasn't full of claims, but
realities. And to you, those
realities are preferable to America's flexing its muscles. How very
conscionable! Now that the war is over and the reconstruction is taking shape, you're wishing for
everything to go wrong just so you can salvage your ego.
Indeed, how's your conscience doing?
Of course, I wasn't talking to you -- my gentle,
freedom-loving, Iraq-supporting readers. I know your conscience is
as intact as it's ever been. I was talking to you
-- The Independent and your lamentable Robert Fisk,
the wayward Amnesty International and like-minded
cultists.
Sure, my country has its problems and the messenger should
be thanked, not killed. You, however, are not a
messenger, but a defamer. "State-sponsored brutality" is a
SERIOUS accusation, okay? That's an apparatus Saddam used to
amass and keep his power. If you're going to paint Thailand
with that brush then it's only a matter of ethics to provide
some hard evidence. And no,
this kind of report by the Bunkum Post (AI's most
often cited source) isn't it:
Now two months into the Thai government's 2003 war on drugs,
over two thousand people have been killed, approximately
thirty people a day.
(Why this is bad evidence I'll explain a later post. For
now, suffice it to say that the use of the passive voice
should set off the alarm for anyone with half a brain.)
As for the other two charges, Goodness Gracious, they're
true! And you know what's more, we Thais don't think it's a
big deal! Yeah, we're barbaric like that. The death penalty
in particular is so utterly well loved it's not even up for
debate. Personally I happen to be a sissy on this one and opposes
it. But who am I? Certainly not one of those European
elitist policymakers who can dream up stuff irrespective of
their peoples' opinions.
Now corruption, in principle, is less popular. Yet everyone
does it in Thailand. Not just the law enforcement officers,
but everybody right down to the janitor who steals toilet
paper. So whatcha gonna do about it?
"...[tourists] should go with their eyes open"
Only "eyes open"? I say more. Throw in pouted lips, wrinkled
nose, disgusted face and wagging finger. Now that would
really help improve the situation. Thank you for your
support.
Indeed I wish I could return the favor.
Even the UK, they point out, has not escaped criticism -
ethical tourists from overseas may choose to avoid Britain
because of its overcrowded jails, treatment of
asylum-seekers or the war on Iraq.
But I can't, because I'm very unethical.
Next time I
visit the UK again (hopefully soon), I'll seek out Tony
Blair (who surely will still be at Number 10) and personally
express my appreciation for his vital role on the Iraq war.
With luck, a big placard will do. (I won't strip to get
attention, though; that's only for idiots.) Then I'll walk down
to the Cabinet WAR Room to honor, once again, the memories
of the great man Winston Churchill.
And then I'll spare a thought for you --
smug, hypocritical, libelous, one-sided, self-righteous,
civilization-hating, terror-rationalizing wretched prisoners
in the overcrowded jail of your own depraved ideology. The
dark side will beckon. Robert Fisk showed remarkable empathy
for the afghans who roughed him up; certainly he would
extend that to another third-worlder like me, right?
But no, really. Despite being a war hawk, I'm not at all a
violent type. You see, with Saddam, he and his wicked breed
would be there forever unless someone removed them by force.
But with you, there's no need. The stuff you're
made of, decomposes. So I'll simply be watching. Eyes open
wide.
23:43
Friday, August 01, 2003
Come one, come all
Some
news is good news.
A group of 10 North Koreans sought refuge in the Japanese
embassy in Bangkok yesterday, in what appeared to be the
latest in a wave of asylum bids by defectors from the
communist country.
Can you imagine? A whole new world awaits them. A free
world. And full stomachs to boot.
This sort of embassy rush happened quite frequently when I
was in China. Every time I celebrated and every time the
authorities grumbled. At no request of the embassies (who
were willing to help the refugees), the Chinese beefed up
"security" around the compounds -- more wujing's
("armed police" a cross between policemen and soldiers),
more barbed wire and more jittery.
Needless to say, the Thai authorities are much, much more
enlightened than that. Right, Mr. Thaksin?
23:11
Thursday, July 31, 2003
Who's her editor?
I
blogged earlier about the
alcohol ad ban. But let's forget that for a second and
read
this as it is:
Ad ban has my vote of support
The government notched up a few more points
with parents/voters this week by endorsing the ban on the
day-time advertising of alcohol and pep drinks.
Despite the grumblings of health advocacy groups that the
ban excluded professional sports, this was a big step
forward in protecting our kids from believing that drinking
is chic. And the ban on pep drink advertising was a bonus
for us parents since it was not originally slated on the ad
ban agenda.
[And we skip to the last three paragraphs]
The Chana villagers who don't want the Thai-Malaysian gas
pipeline are asking this very question.
Ours is an increasingly urban, rootless society with
widening disparities. Can we maintain peace if we see
ourselves solely as individual consumers with no empathy for
those on the margins?
The poor cannot offer bargains. But they can offer us a
chance to prove we still have a heart. Will we let this
chance pass us by?
Get it? Me, neither. Indeed, that's an awful lot of dots to
connect between the introduction and the ending.
And the author didn't connect them. If you read the whole
article, you'll find that her words barely cling together, much
less sentences, much less paragraphs. Her confused
sentimentalism makes sense only on a different plane of
thought, where alcohol, pep drink, advertisement, gas
pipeline, urbanity, the media and the Thaksin administration
are but one and the same vice.
But isn't the administration banning the ad? Aren't his
paternalistic ways a natural match for her maternal
instincts ("...childrearing has become not just high art,
but risky journey...")? Well, I guess we're blinded by
rationality.
Anyway, there's a point in my wasting your time with all
this. Sanitsuda Ekachai -- the author in question -- is a Bangkok Post
editor! She edits! And she's not just any junior
editor, but in charge of "Outlook", the art and leisure
section.
Read the whole
piece and you'll understand my dismay.
23:42
Puritans at the gate
I love those Heineken commercials, the latest of which
features Jennifer Aniston at her very best (she doesn't
talk). Indeed they are the most intellectually stimulating
thing you can watch on Thailand's primetime TV. Oh well, it
was good while it lasted.
Ban on liquor ads endorsed
Cabinet has approved a ban on broadcasting of advertisements
for alcoholic beverages between 5am and 10pm, and in a
surprise move included energy drinks in the ban.
So, what's next? Ban on chewing gum? Then
chastity for men and prohibition for all?
22:48
Not exactly gung ho
The Bangkok Post
reports the planned deployment of Thai troops in Iraq.
Headline:
Thais will be 'safe in Iraq'
First sentence:
...886 Thai soldiers to be deployed in Iraq from September
will not come under attack.
Second sentence:
...the engineering battalion of 886
technicians, medical staff and military police officers were
unlikely to be target of attacks.
Third sentence:
The pro-Saddam elements who attacked US
soldiers were unlikely to turn on other foreign troops...
Jeez. What hell would break lose if a soldier so much as
stubbed his toe? Iraq will be no walk in the park and
the troops might indeed be attacked. And yet we're willing to take the risk for so worthy a cause. To deny the danger (and downplay the whole
thing) is to trivialize our boys' sacrifice.
13:34
Wednesday, July 30, 2003
Your pariah, our partner
Two headlines from today's Bangkok Post:
US imposes sanctions, slams junta
Thailand to tap Burma for IT skills
Perfect timing. We don't expect any less from our politicians, really. And IT skills, of all things!
"...a broadband internet connection will need to be
established between the two countries in order to reduce
traffic through the United States."
Woo-hoo. That means next time we, say, bid for
SLORC
memorabilia on eJunta, it'll be fast and direct! No detour to the States!
Isn't that just grand!
Meanwhile, what's-her-name and her friends can languish in
prison. Tough luck.
update I do feel
sheepish about being so tongue-in-cheek. I didn't mean to
belittle Aung San Suu Kyi and her people's suffering.
22:38
B is for...
BRAHIMI (Which is most beautiful, her
face, her biography, her accent or her name?)
update
Yes, that's a bad photo of her.
This is better.
16:36
Dodgy Dowd
Funny, the Bangkok Post publishes a lot of Maureen Dowd's op-eds, too. And yet you'll never hear its editors make this sort of complaint. [via Sully]
While that's mostly due to their abject inability to recognize such an error (they make a lot themselves), their blind infatuation with Dowd must also be explained by their none-too-subtle bias. She sings a tune they like to hear, so they swallow her up (as they do Krugman and Kristof -- two other darlings).
The Thai reader will find an unfamiliar term in the linked article -- "correction". What's a correction? No, it's not the boxed apology that the Thai newspaper (including the Post) publishes in order to settle a libel suit. These are corrections. The New York Times may not be perfect, but at least it's a real newspaper.
But, hey, this's supposed to be about "Dodgy Dowd", not the "Bunkum Post"!
14:47
Loonier than thou
Wow, that's almost impressive. I mean, even the wackos that dominate the Thai press and academia can't beat that. Uh, knock on wood.
11:15
Tuesday, July 29, 2003
What a difference two years makes
Some BusinessWeek articles relating to the Thaksin
administration, in chronological order:
Will Banking Reform Get the Boot, Too?
June 11, 2001 | The fall of Thailand's central banker bodes
ill
Thai Farmers: "A Good Bank in a Bad Environment"
June 18, 2001 | Will Bangkok undo the bank's
remarkable recovery?
Under
Suspicion in Thailand
April 15, 2002 | Thai Premier Thaksin stands accused of
conflicts of interest
Thailand's Debt Undertow
September 23, 2002 | Bad loans threaten to slow the nation's
recovery
Will Thailand Be Hamstrung by Handouts?
July 14, 2003 | Growth is strong, but critics say a debt
bomb could go off
Thaksin's Thailand
July 28, 2003 | The country is safer and richer under
the Prime Minister -- controversy or no [emphasis added]
That's what I call a turnaround artist. No, two turnaround artists. No, one artist and one convert. Whatever.
22:48
Dateline Bunkum
Liberal slant? Vast right-wing conspiracy? Bangkok’s risible media will make you grateful for your newsmongers.
"... ลัทธิ Zionism ซึ่งสนับสนุนให้ชาวยิวอพยพไปอยู่ในป่า"
"… Zionism, a doctrine that encourages the Jews to migrate
to the woods." [my translation from Thai]
Matichon, 6.16.2003
See? I told you. Now go give your nearest journalist a pat in the back. Unless, of course, you're in Thailand, in which case, "pat" them with a golf club.
P.S. Matichon, by the way, is a "highbrow" daily by Thailand's (very low)
standards. Its motto: "Quality newspaper for the quality of the country". No wonder.
20:16
Monday, July 28, 2003
Multilingual test
ไทย français 中文
update
Test successful!
18:50
Sunday, July 27, 2003
B is for... BRAVO! (Bonne CONTINUATION, Lance!)
update Read this and appreciate his victory even more. [via LGF]
23:21
How B began...
I wanted to make my first post rather special. The idea was to
present a little story of how this blog came about, starting
from the time when it seemed least probable. But this little
story took on a life of its own and turned into a long and so
far unending story. So I decide to serialize it. Below is the
first installment in the series of four, perhaps five.
COCOON
It was a complete break from history.
I was ignorant of the world, too ignorant to know it, and much
too ignorant to care. Everything began and ended within my
immediate surrounding that was my cocoon that was my universe.
I sought no information from outside this cocoon -- not from
newspapers, nor magazines, nor radio nor even TV. I was a
college student, you see.
Of course not all students were like that. There were always
read copies the New York Times and the USA Today lying around
in the campus center. I just had no idea what kind of people
bought them.
There were times, actually, when I got rather curious. I would
grab one of those discarded papers, but only to turn straight
to the art and leisure section for movie blurbs. When my pizza
was finished, so was my "reading".
And that's when I was curious. When I wasn't, my attitude
could turn downright disdainful toward those who . So, say,
when I saw one of those I-banker types immersing himself in
the Wall Street Journal, I thought: Who the devil does
this guy think he is? Sherman McCoy? Gordon Gekko?
Another instance, it was my junior year abroad and I was
studying architecture in Paris. A classmate of mine, Lorraine
I think, was reading the International Herald Tribune in the
studio and that drew a quick frown from me. What a
slacker, I thought, procrastinating like that. And how typical
of Americans to always be clinging on to their culture. What's
the point of their going abroad?
What she was reading, I never thought to ask. Looking back, it
probably had something to do with the war that was raging just
some thousand kilometers away in the Balkan. The war her
countrymen were fighting, yet again, to protect the
defenseless. The war to stop a genocidal tyrant and his thugs.
The war I was unconscious of.
Not knowing, not caring, I congratulated myself for knowing
better. I wasn't reading any newspapers, no, but if I'd wanted
to do, it would certainly have been a local paper -- Le Monde,
perhaps. How smart of me to be able to read French.
Sophistication, c'est moi.
23:16
For more
B
, please see the
archives. |